Back

On the record

Yair Lapid

Opposition Leader · Hostage deal versus continued fighting

78% confidenceMedium Confidence
Sequence playback unavailable

No verified clip timings exist for this contradiction yet. The sources below are the record.

THENFeb 12, 2025
RT @YeshAtidParty: זו רשימת נבחרי הציבור שהצביעו נגד אישור הכנסת לעסקת חטופים עד החטוף האחרון, ושוב הפקירו אותם ואת משפחתם. משה אבוטבול…

X (Twitter) @yairlapid

NOWJul 7, 2025
RT @YuvalKarni: יו״ר האופוזיציה @yairlapid על עסקת חטופים: ״נתניהו צריך להביא עסקת חטופים סופית. לא עסקה חלקית ולא פעימות אלא להחזיר את כל…

X (Twitter) @yairlapid

What changed

In Statement A (February 2025), Lapid retweeted criticism of MKs who voted against approving a hostage deal 'until the last hostage,' implying support for a deal even if partial or phased. In Statement B (July 2025), Lapid is quoted demanding a 'final hostage deal' — explicitly rejecting a partial deal or phased approach ('not a partial deal and not phases'). These positions appear in tension: Statement A criticizes those who blocked a deal (seemingly any deal), while Statement B sets conditions that rule out incremental or partial deals. However, the two statements concern different points in time and potentially different deal proposals, and Lapid's position in Statement B may reflect a changed negotiating context rather than a direct flip on the same specific deal.

Embed this contradiction

Paste this into your article. The widget stays in sync with the record.

Every claim on this page links to its source. Nothing is generated.

Explore VeriVote